Our days as educators at Proctor are varied. We start in the classroom, move seamlessly to advisory period or assembly and have the opportunity for informal conversations related to our work and our lives with students and colleagues during lunch. Following afternoon class, we head to the athletic fields and afternoon programs. Our time here is different than that which we spend in the classroom; our focus more immediate on the next game, performance, or contest. But should it be?



In a recent interview on NPR, Dr. Craig Owens, an English professor at Drake University, discussed the program he co-created called “Coaching in the Classroom”. After years of teaching, he had the opportunity to observe the women’s basketball team at Drake and saw the level of engagement on the team was far greater than any classroom he had experienced, “A lot of what I hoped to happen in my classroom was already taking place in the locker room.”



Athletes were not dependent on the coach to be the sole leader, but instead drove conversation during halftime, were self-directed, willing to take the lead in developing strategy toward reaching their end goal.

Owens noticed that unlike many Hollywood sports movies, coaches are not always inspirational, authoritarian leaders, but are guides, asking leading questions to prod their players to think critically about the next play. The coaches he observed had such a different approach from his experience with the traditional academic professor who lectured and tried to shape student opinion, rather than allowing students to formulate their own opinions.



After repeated observations, Owens realized the most successful teams had a clear system in place. Players knew what to expect, how to engage, how to ask the right questions, and run the right plays. His classroom on the other hand did not. His students eventually figured out his expectations, but understanding literary criticism of Shakespeare didn’t follow a plan, it simply happened. As students did more and more literary review, they would become adept at it, but there certainly wasn’t a playbook for them to follow to help them engage in the process. 



If a visitor were to observe any one of Proctor’s classes in action, our integrated roles as coaches AND teachers would be evident. Whether we are coaching students in basketball, lacrosse, or theater during the afternoons, or teaching English, science or economics during the day, our approach does not vary.

We understand that students need a playbook. They need to know our expectations of them, and ideally play a part in shaping those expectations. They need to be taught how to engage, not just be expected to do so. They need to be guided toward knowledge, not told what to know. They need to have a clear objective, a relevance, to their learning that provides perspective. 



Tonight, varsity coaches sat together to discuss and vote on end of year athletic awards for our graduating seniors. As coaches spoke about the athletes they nominated to the group, many got emotional. Tears filled the eyes of coaches as they spoke because of the depth of relationships formed with their players. Relationships formed in the classroom AND on the playing fields. Coaches are teachers. Teachers are coaches. We teach as we coach, and we coach as we teach.